Outer Ideas conspiracy The Massacre That Disarmed Australia’s Guns is Suspect as Heck! (Port Arthur Massacre-the Australian One)

The Massacre That Disarmed Australia’s Guns is Suspect as Heck! (Port Arthur Massacre-the Australian One)

The Massacre That Disarmed Australia’s Guns is Suspect as Heck! (Port Arthur Massacre-the Australian One) post thumbnail image

Unraveling the Controversy Surrounding the Port Arthur Massacre: A Call for Transparency

The tragic events of the Port Arthur Massacre in 1996 led to sweeping firearm regulations in Australia, fundamentally altering the country’s relationship with guns. However, the circumstances surrounding the shooter, Martin Bryant, raise a number of questions that merit closer examination. A comprehensive review of the facts suggests inconsistencies that might make us reconsider what we thought we knew.

Inconsistencies That Demand Attention

  1. The Shooter’s Handedness: One of the most striking discrepancies lies in Bryant’s handedness. Although he is left-handed, the shooter exhibited right-handed shooting techniques.

  2. Alarming Marksmanship: The precision displayed during the tragedy is reminiscent of a highly skilled marksman. Bryant is alleged to have fired 17 rounds in a mere 15 seconds, injuring or killing 22 individuals, with a remarkable number of headshots fired from an awkward position. Additionally, reports suggest he made three accurate shots from 300 yards at fleeing targets.

  3. Mental Capacity and Weapon Handling: Despite being classified as legally mentally disabled with an IQ of 66—comparable to that of an average 11-year-old—Bryant demonstrated strategic thinking and planning that seems inconsistent with this diagnosis. Furthermore, he was known to be uncomfortable with firearms and had difficulty managing weaponry when under pressure.

  4. Survivor Accounts: Eyewitnesses who survived the shooting and were familiar with Bryant assert that he was not the perpetrator.

  5. Police Absence: Local law enforcement, who might have responded swiftly to the incident, were reportedly dispatched to the opposite side of the island for what has been described as a fake drug bust just before the tragedy unfolded.

  6. Lack of Thorough Investigation: Despite existing government policies recommending a coronial inquest, no such inquiry was conducted, and meaningful investigations appear to have been largely absent.

  7. Restricted Access to Information: Following inquiries by journalists, critical case files were classified under the highest level of restriction and are sealed for a staggering 100 years.

These points are just the tip of the iceberg regarding the troubling aspects surrounding this event.

Time for Reflection and Awareness

Given the massive implications of the Port Arthur Massacre—including the near-total disarmament of Australian citizens—it is crucial that this incident undergoes a far more rigorous and transparent investigation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Post