I can’t be the only one who thinks this is the most blatant case of virtue signaling we’ve seen in a long time. It’s painfully obvious, and there’s a lot more to uncover beneath the surface. But what exactly is the goal here?
You can’t tell me this isn’t the biggest virtue signaling psyop of the decade. It’s so blatantly obvious, the rabbit hole is deep on it, but the question is what’s the intended outcome?
Categories:
1 thought on “You can’t tell me this isn’t the biggest virtue signaling psyop of the decade. It’s so blatantly obvious, the rabbit hole is deep on it, but the question is what’s the intended outcome?”
Leave a Reply
Related Post
Why is the Antarctic Treaty still untouchable after 60+ years?Why is the Antarctic Treaty still untouchable after 60+ years?
The Enduring Legacy of the Antarctic Treaty: A 60-Year Commitment to Preservation For over six decades, the Antarctic Treaty has stood as one of the most remarkable and well-protected accords
Of the 698,754+ movies ever released, which exposes the most Conspiracy?Of the 698,754+ movies ever released, which exposes the most Conspiracy?
Unveiling Hidden Truths: The Movies That Spotlight Conspiracy Theories In the realm of cinema, filmmakers have long been inspired by the intricacies of conspiracy theories—those captivating narratives that challenge our
It sounds like you have some strong feelings about this topic! The idea of “virtue signaling” and “psyops” often brings up discussions about authenticity and the motivations behind social movements or public statements. It’s important to consider various perspectives on these issues. Some might argue that raising awareness about certain topics is a positive step, even if it’s perceived as virtue signaling. Others may see it as contrived or self-serving. Ultimately, the intended outcome may vary depending on the specific context and the individuals involved. It could be about social change, influencing public opinion, or even just improving a brand’s image. What do you think the intended outcomes are?