Outer Ideas conspiracy The Mormon Church came out HARD against Utah’s medical marijuana initiative. Last week, MormonLeaks leaked a doc proving the church owns nearly a billion in big pharma stocks. That’s right, it likely had nothing to do with religion & everything to do with $$$.

The Mormon Church came out HARD against Utah’s medical marijuana initiative. Last week, MormonLeaks leaked a doc proving the church owns nearly a billion in big pharma stocks. That’s right, it likely had nothing to do with religion & everything to do with $$$.

The Mormon Church came out HARD against Utah’s medical marijuana initiative. Last week, MormonLeaks leaked a doc proving the church owns nearly a billion in big pharma stocks. That’s right, it likely had nothing to do with religion & everything to do with $$$. post thumbnail image

Investigating the Financial Motivations Behind the Mormon Church’s Opposition to Utah’s Medical Marijuana Initiative

In recent developments, the LDS Church has taken an unequivocal stance against Utah’s proposed medical marijuana legislation, engaging in a vigorous public campaign to oppose its passage. However, new revelations suggest there may be underlying financial motives influencing the Church’s position. A leaked document, obtained and shared by MormonLeaks, indicates that the Church owns nearly a billion dollars worth of investments in the pharmaceutical industry, raising questions about whether financial interests could be playing a role in their opposition to medical cannabis reforms.

The Leak and What It Reveals

The document in question provides a detailed overview of the Church’s investment portfolio as of late 2017. It discloses substantial holdings in major pharmaceutical companies, including:

  • Celgene (CELG): $347 million in shares
  • Johnson & Johnson (JNJ): $490 million in shares
  • Abbott Laboratories (ABT): $242 million in shares
  • Gilead Sciences (GILD): $101 million in shares
  • Pfizer (PFE): $73 million in shares
  • AbbVie (ABBV): $39 million in shares
  • Merck & Co. (MRK): $19 million in shares

Altogether, these holdings amount to over one billion dollars in pharmaceutical assets. This extensive investment suggests that the Church has significant financial ties to the very industry that stands to benefit — or be negatively impacted — by medical marijuana legislation.

Context and Implications

While the LDS Church publicly expressed opposition to the medical marijuana initiative, such financial disclosures invite reflection on potential motives. Critics argue that the Church’s stance may not solely be rooted in doctrinal or health concerns, but could also be influenced by commercial interests within the pharmaceutical sector. Given the substantial investments, it is conceivable that the Church might have reasons, financial or otherwise, to inhibit access to alternative medical options such as medical cannabis.

Understanding the Broader Picture

The involvement of religious and institutional organizations in political and social issues is complex, often influenced by multiple factors. In this case, the intersection of religious influence, financial interests, and public health policy raises important questions about transparency and motives.

It is crucial for the public and stakeholders to consider these revelations critically. Transparency regarding financial interests is fundamental to fostering trust and ensuring that policy debates are informed by facts rather than undisclosed conflicts.

Sources and Further Reading

For those interested in exploring the leaked document and related articles, the following links provide additional context:

Conclusion

The revelation that the Mormon Church holds significant investments in pharmaceutical giants adds a new layer to the ongoing debate over medical marijuana legislation. While motives are complex and multi-faceted, transparency and open dialogue are essential as communities navigate policies affecting health, wellness, and societal change. As this story unfolds, continued scrutiny and investigation will be vital in understanding the full scope of influences shaping public policy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Related Post