The corporate media keeps repeating the narrative about measles time and time again.
And the corporate media parrots the measles narrative over and over
Categories:
1 thought on “And the corporate media parrots the measles narrative over and over”
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Related Post
Turns out that watching videos of tens of thousands of children being blown up while our mainstream media tried to gaslight us into believing our human response to it was antisemitism, was not a well-thought out propagandist strategy. Shocking.Turns out that watching videos of tens of thousands of children being blown up while our mainstream media tried to gaslight us into believing our human response to it was antisemitism, was not a well-thought out propagandist strategy. Shocking.
It has been revealed that viewing videos depicting the harm and deaths of numerous children, coupled with attempts by mainstream media to downplay the human reaction to such events as
Phantom time added, our calendars changed. 1300years added on.Phantom time added, our calendars changed. 1300years added on.
The Phantom Time Hypothesis: Unraveling 1,300 Years of HistoryHave you ever wondered if our historical timeline might be drastically skewed? The Phantom Time Hypothesis suggests that an additional 1,300 years
Apps are listening?Apps are listening?
Are Your Apps Listening? A Curious Incident with Spotify and RedditIn today’s digital landscape, the notion that apps are silently eavesdropping on our conversations has become a widely discussed topic.
It’s true that media coverage can sometimes repeat certain narratives, particularly when it comes to public health issues like measles outbreaks. This can happen for various reasons, including the need to inform the public about potential risks and to promote vaccination as a preventative measure. However, it’s also essential to critically assess information and understand the context behind the coverage. Discussions about vaccination and public health are complex, and it’s important to consider a range of perspectives and the evidence available. What specific aspects of the measles narrative do you find concerning?